Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19197064›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2009

Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities.

Shanwu Tang, Daven C Presgraves

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hybrid incompatibility emerges at the one-cell stage in interspeciesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanwu TangDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Daven C Presgraves
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Molecular genetics of hybrid incompatibilities in DrosophilaR01GM079543 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PRESGRAVES, DAVEN C · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079543NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM079543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speciation often involves the evolution of incompatible gene interactions that cause sterility or lethality in hybrids between populations. These so-called hybrid incompatibilities occur between two or more functionally divergent loci. We show that the nucleoporin 160kDa (Nup160) gene of the fruitfly Drosophila simulans is incompatible with one or more factors on the D. melanogaster X chromosome, causing hybrid lethality. Nup160 encodes a nuclear pore complex protein and shows evidence of adaptive evolution. Furthermore, the protein encoded by Nup160 directly interacts with that of another hybrid lethality gene, Nup96, indicating that at least two lethal hybrid incompatibility genes have evolved as byproducts of divergent coevolution among interacting components of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic SpeciationAnimalsChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, InsectHybridization, GeneticMaleMolecular Sequence DataMutationNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsSelection, GeneticDrosophila Proteinsnuclear pore complex protein 96Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19197064
PMCPMC2826207
OpenAlexW1999425046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.