Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19197042›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2009

Comment on "Human-specific gain of function in a developmental enhancer".

Laurent Duret, Nicolas Galtier

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Contrasts between adaptive coding and noncoding changes during human evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Many human accelerated regions are developmental enhancers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Detecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurent DuretUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France. duret@biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr
Nicolas Galtier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prabhakar et al. (Reports, 5 September 2008, p. 1346) argued that the conserved noncoding sequence HACNS1 has undergone positive selection and contributed to human adaptation. However, the pattern of substitution in HACNS1 is more consistent with the neutral process of biased gene conversion (BGC). The reported human-specific gain of function is likely due to the accumulation of deleterious mutations driven by BGC, not positive selection.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene ConversionAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHumansMutationRecombination, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.