ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2009
Whole genome amplification for array comparative genomic hybridization using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a novelOncology letters · 2018Article
- Genomic losses at 5q13.2 and 8p23.1 in dysplastic hepatocytes are common events in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Overexpression of IL-7 enhances cisplatin resistance in glioma.Cancer biology & therapy · 2012Article
- Alterations in the RB1 pathway in low-grade diffuse gliomas lacking common genetic alterations.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2011Article
- Future medical applications of single-cell sequencing in cancer.Genome medicine · 2011Article
- Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing.Nature · 2011Article
- Copy number and loss of heterozygosity detected by SNP array of formalin-fixed tissues using whole-genome amplification.PloS one · 2011Article
- Intratumoral patterns of genomic imbalance in glioblastomas.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2010Article
- Blood and tissue biomarkers in prostate cancer: state of the art.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is useful to assess genome-wide chromosomal imbalance, but the requirement for relatively large amounts of DNA can be a limitation, in particular for samples extracted from small tumor areas on paraffin sections. Whole genome amplification (WGA) can be performed before array CGH to obtain sufficient DNA, but the possibility of artifacts attributable to biased amplification cannot be excluded. We optimized the WGA protocol to generate sufficient DNA with minimum amplification bias. Using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections of tumors carrying known TP53 mutations, LOH 1p, LOH 10q, LOH 19q, and EGFR amplification, we first optimized the protocol so that these genetic alterations were detected after WGA. We found that a ligation step before WGA is important because it allows a short reaction time with Phi29 to generate WGA-DNA with greatly decreased amplification bias. Using template >150 ng of DNA, a ligation step before WGA, and a short reaction time with Phi29 DNA polymerase (<1.5 hours), we obtained WGA-DNA (>4 mug) with minimum amplification bias (less than threefold). Using this protocol, we performed array CGH (Agilent 105K) before and after WGA. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation in array CGH results between DNA before and after WGA (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that genetic analyses are possible using WGA-DNA extracted from paraffin sections, but that they should be performed with a carefully optimized and controlled protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.