Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19196125›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2009

Fabrication of nonwoven coaxial fiber meshes by electrospinning.

Anita Saraf, Genevieve Lozier, Andrea Haesslein, F Kurtis Kasper, Robert M Raphael, L Scott Baggett, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. 3D tissue-engineered model of Ewing's sarcoma.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polymeric nanofibers in tissue engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2011
    Review
  13. Regulated non-viral gene delivery from coaxial electrospun fiber mesh scaffolds.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anita SarafDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA.
Genevieve Lozier
Andrea Haesslein
F Kurtis Kasper
Robert M Raphael
L Scott Baggett
Antonios G Mikos

Funding

Injectable Cellular Composites for Cartilage EngineeringR01AR048756 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KASPER, FRED KURTIS, MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2003 to 2014
$3.3M
Regulated Osteochondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Gene DeliveryR21AR056076 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2008 to 2009
$360k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048756NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR48756NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR056076NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR56076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a great need for biodegradable polymer scaffolds that can regulate the delivery of bioactive factors such as drugs, plasmids, and proteins. Coaxial electrospinning is a novel technique that is currently being explored to create such polymer scaffolds by embedding within them aqueous-based biological molecules. In this study, we evaluated the influence of various processing parameters such as sheath polymer concentration, core polymer concentration and molecular weight, and salt ions within the core polymer on coaxial fiber morphology. The sheath polymer used in this study was poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL), and the core polymer was poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). We examined the effects of the various processing parameters on core diameters, total fiber diameters, and sheath thicknesses of coaxial microfibers using a 2(4) full factorial statistical model. The maximum increase in total fiber diameter was observed with increase in sheath polymer (PCL) concentration from 9 to 11 wt% (0.49+/-0.03 microm) and salt concentration within the core from 0 to 500 mM (0.38+/-0.03 microm). The core fiber diameter was most influenced by the sheath and core polymer (PCL and PEG, respectively) concentrations, the latter of which increased from 200 to 400 mg/mL (0.40+/-0.01 microm and 0.36+/-0.01 microm, respectively). The core polymer (PEG) concentration had a maximal negative effect on sheath thickness (0.40+/-0.03 microm), while salt concentration had the maximal positive effect (0.28+/-0.03 microm). Molecular weight increases in core polymer (PEG) from 1.0 to 4.6 kDa caused moderate increases in total and sheath fiber diameters and sheath thicknesses. These experiments provide important information that lays the foundation required for the synthesis of coaxial fibers with tunable dimensions.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsElectrochemistryMaterials TestingParticle SizePolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsRotationSurface PropertiesTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialspolycaprolactonePolyestersPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID19196125
PMCPMC2738761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.