Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19193975›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2009

The elasticity of motor-microtubule bundles and shape of the mitotic spindle.

B Rubinstein, K Larripa, P Sommi, A Mogilner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bridging the gap between sister kinetochores.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B RubinsteinStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
K Larripa
P Sommi
A Mogilner
University of California, Davis · USHumboldt State University · USStowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Modeling mitotic spindle assemblyR01GM068952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MOGILNER, ALEXANDER · 2003 to 2014
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM068952NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of cell division, chromosomes are segregated by mitotic spindles -- bipolar microtubule arrays that have a characteristic fusiform shape. Mitotic spindle function is based on motor-generated forces of hundreds of piconewtons. These forces have to deform the spindle, yet the role of microtubule elastic deformations in the spindle remains unclear. Here we solve equations of elasticity theory for spindle microtubules, compare the solutions with shapes of early Drosophila embryo spindles and discuss the biophysical and cell biological implications of this analysis. The model suggests that microtubule bundles in the spindle behave like effective compressed springs with stiffness of the order of tens of piconewtons per micron, that microtubule elasticity limits the motors' power, and that clamping and cross-linking of microtubules are needed to transduce the motors' forces in the spindle. Some data are hard to reconcile with the model predictions, suggesting that cytoskeletal structures laterally reinforce the spindle and/or that rapid microtubule turnover relieves the elastic stresses.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalElasticityMicrotubulesSpindle Apparatus

Identifiers

PMID19193975
PMCPMC2723726
OpenAlexW2130025832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.