Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19193843›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Distribution of genes encoding MSCRAMMs and Pili in clinical and natural populations of Enterococcus faecium.

Jouko Sillanpää, Vittal P Prakash, Sreedhar R Nallapareddy, Barbara E Murray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. VirulenceFinder forMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and Characterization of High-ThroughputFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jouko SillanpääDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. bem.asst@uth.tmc.edu
Vittal P Prakash
Sreedhar R Nallapareddy
Barbara E Murray

Funding

Importance of adhesin-like proteins of Enteroccocus faeciumR01AI067861 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MURRAY, BARBARA E · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococcus faecium has recently emerged as an important cause of nosocomial infections. We previously identified 15 predicted surface proteins with characteristics of MSCRAMMs and/or pili and demonstrated that their genes were frequently present in 30 clinical E. faecium isolates studied; one of these, acm, has been studied in further detail. To determine the prevalence of the other 14 genes among various E. faecium populations, we have now assessed 433 E. faecium isolates, including 264 isolates from human clinical infections, 69 isolates from stools of hospitalized patients, 70 isolates from stools of community volunteers, and 30 isolates from animal-related sources. A variable distribution of the 14 genes was detected, with their presence ranging from 51% to 98% of isolates. While 81% of clinical isolates carried 13 or 14 of the 14 genes tested, none of the community group isolates and only 13% of animal isolates carried 13 or 14 genes. The presence of these genes was most frequent in endocarditis isolates, with 11 genes present in all isolates, followed by isolates from other clinical sources. The number of genes significantly associated with clinical versus fecal or animal origin (P = 0.04 to <0.0001) varied from 10 to 13, depending on whether comparisons were made against individual clinical subgroups (endocarditis, blood, and other clinical isolates) or against all clinical isolates combined as one group. The strong association of these genes with clinical isolates raises the possibility that their preservation/acquisition has favored the adaptation of E. faecium to nosocomial environments and/or patients.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAdhesins, BacterialAnimalsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialEnterococcus faeciumFecesFimbriae, BacterialGenotypeGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansVirulence FactorsAcm protein, Enterococcus faeciumAdhesins, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID19193843
PMCPMC2668297
OpenAlexW2167587663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.