Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19193835›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Evaluation of different RNA extraction methods and storage conditions of dried plasma or blood spots for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA quantification and PCR amplification for drug resistance testing.

Marjorie Monleau, Céline Montavon, Christian Laurent, Michel Segondy, Brigitte Montes, Eric Delaporte, François Boillot, Martine Peeters

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marjorie MonleauUMR 145, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, and University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.
Céline Montavon
Christian Laurent
Michel Segondy
Brigitte Montes
Eric Delaporte
François Boillot
Martine Peeters

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and validation of dried sample spots as a method of specimen collection are urgently needed in developing countries for monitoring of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Our aim was to test some crucial steps in the use of dried spots, i.e., viral recovery and storage over time. Moreover, we investigated whether dried plasma and blood spots (DPS and DBS, respectively) give comparable viral load (VL) results. Four manual RNA extraction methods from commercial HIV type 1 (HIV-1) VL assays--a QIAamp minikit (Qiagen), the Abbott Molecular sample preparation system, the Nuclisens assay (bioMarieux), and High Pure viral nucleic acid kit (Roche Applied Science)--were compared for VL quantification and PCR amplification for genotypic drug resistance testing on dried spots from spiked plasma and residual samples from HIV-1 patients (n = 47; median VL, 4.13 log(10) copies/ml). RNA recovery from DPS was efficient using Nuclisens extraction (median difference, 0.03 log(10) copies/ml) and slightly underestimated using the Abbott Molecular sample preparation system (median difference, 0.35 log(10) copies/ml). PCR amplification results were in concordance. Measurements from DBS overestimated VL for plasma, with VL results showing <3.7 log(10) copies/ml. VL was stable for up to 3 months in spiked DPS stored at 20 degrees C but for only 1 month at 37 degrees C. A faster decline was observed in PCR efficiency: DPS could be stored for 1 week at 37 degrees C and for 1 month at 20 degrees C. In conclusion, the RNA extraction method is an important factor in obtaining reliable RNA quantification and PCR amplification of HIV-1 on DPS/DBS. DBS could be used as an alternative for DPS depending on HIV RNA cutoffs for virological failure. VL measurements remain stable over a longer period than do PCR amplification results.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralBloodDesiccationHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlasmaPolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, ViralSpecimen HandlingTemperatureTime FactorsViral LoadReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19193835
PMCPMC2668360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.