Trial reportJournal of applied behavior analysis2008
Effects of initial abstinence and programmed lapses on the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking.
Trial report in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- A Secondary Analysis of a Preliminary Contingency Management Intervention for Presurgical Cancer Patients: Evaluating Individual Participant Data.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Trial
- Examining the effects of initial smoking abstinence on response to smoking-related stimuli and response inhibition in a human laboratory model.Psychopharmacology · 2014Trial
- Changes in the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking as a function of initial abstinence.Psychopharmacology · 2009Trial
- How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review.BMC public health · 2024Review
- A Behavior Analytic Interpretation of Concussion Reporting in Athletes: How the Field of Behavior Analysis Can Help Make Athletes Safer.Journal of athletic training · 2023Review
- Normal values of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy subjects: comparison between two methods of assessment.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2014Article
- Breath carbon monoxide output is affected by speed of emptying the lungs: implications for laboratory and smoking cessation research.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2010Article
- Introduction to the special issue on the behavior analysis and treatment of drug addiction.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2008Article
- Voucher-based contingency management and in-treatment behaviors in smoking cessation treatment.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fifty-eight smokers received abstinence-contingent monetary payments for 1 (n=15) or 14 (n=3) days. Those who received contingent payments for 14 days also received 0, 1, or 8 experimenter-delivered cigarette puffs on 5 evenings. The relative reinforcing effects of smoking were assessed in a 3-hr session on the final study day, when participants made 20 choices between smoking or money. The reinforcement contingencies exerted robust control over smoking, and programmed smoking lapses produced few discernible effects. These results further illustrate the robust control that reinforcement contingencies can exert over cigarette smoking and suggest that any effects of lapses on the relative reinforcing effects of smoking are modest under conditions involving abstinence-contingent reinforcement contingencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.