Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19190887›Full record

ReviewHNO2009

[New strategies for tissue replacement in the head and neck region].

U R Gössler, K Hörmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U R GösslerUniversitäts-HNO-Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Fakultät für Medizin Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 68135, Mannheim. ulrich.goessler@hno.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
K Hörmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increase in the need for tissue replacement in the head and neck region. The disadvantages of classical reconstructive procedures are donor site morbidity for autologous transplants and the immunogenity of allogenous transplants. Tissue engineering is a promising method for the generation of autologous cartilagenous transplants for plastic and reconstructive surgery for closure of large defects by the use of minimal amounts of material for reconstruction. For this purpose harvested material must be cultivated in suitable culture/carrier systems. One obstacle is the loss of phenotype and function once the cells are detached from their environment (dedifferentiation). Adult mesenchymal stem cells are a valuable cell source for tissue engineering. The underlying strategy of using stem cells is the replacement of functionally compromised cells either by in vitro expanded stem cells or activation of stem cells in the tissue. However, there are still problems regarding valuable markers for cellular differentiation and the controlled differentiation towards a specific phenotype.

Indexed as

ForecastingHeadHumansNeckPlastic Surgery ProceduresStem Cell TransplantationTissue Transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.