ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2008
Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Cesarean Section in Syria: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Two Largest Health Centers.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Pathological fetal heart rate tracing patterns and neonatal outcomes among parturients beyond 32 weeks of gestation: a prospective observational study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Observational
- Development, Validation, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fetal Lack of Responsiveness Scale for Diagnosis of Severe Perinatal Hypoxia.Journal of pregnancy · 2024Observational
- Evaluation of decision to delivery interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes in Category-I emergency cesarean section deliveries in Phuentsholing General Hospital, 2020: A retrospective cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Decision to Delivery Interval, Perinatal Outcome and Factors Following Emergency Cesarean Section in Southern Ethiopia.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- A Retrospective Review of Decision to Delivery Time Interval for Foetal Distress at a Central Hospital.International journal of women's health · 2022Article
- Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018Article
- SLC9B1 methylation predicts fetal intolerance of labor.Epigenetics · 2018Article
- The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Article
- Decision-to-Delivery Time and Perinatal Complications in Emergency Cesarean Section.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: A retrospective cohort study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2016Article
- Evaluation of Clinical Diagnosis of Fetal Distress and Perinatal Outcome in a Low Resource Nigerian Setting.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo find out the efficacy of continuous fetal heart monitoring by analyzing the cases of cesarean section for nonreassuring fetal heart in labor, detected by cardiotocography (CTG) and correlating these cases with perinatal outcome. To evaluate whether a 30 minute decision to delivery (D-D) interval for emergency cesarean section influences perinatal outcome.
methodsThis was a prospective observational study of 217 patients who underwent cesarean section at > or = 36 weeks for non-reassuring fetal heart in labor detected by CTG. The maternal demographic profile, specific types of abnormal fetal heart rate tracing and the decision to delivery time interval were noted. The adverse immediate neonatal outcomes in terms of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, umbilical cord thornH <7.10, neonates requiring immediate ventilation and NICU admissions were recorded. The correlation between non-reassuring fetal heart, decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome were analyzed.
resultsOut of 3148 patients delivered at > or = 36 weeks, 217 (6.8%) patients underwent cesarean section during labor primarily for non-reassuring fetal heart. The most common fetal heart abnormality was persistent bradycardia in 106 (48.8%) cases followed by late deceleration in 38 (17.5%) cases and decreased beat to beat variability in 17 (7.8%) cases. In 33 (15.2%) babies the 5 minutes Apgar score was <7 out of which 13 (5.9%) babies had cord thornH <7.10. Thirty three (15.2%) babies required NICU admission for suspected birth asphyxia. Rest 184 (84.7%) neonates were born healthy and cared for by mother. Regarding decision to delivery interval of < or =30 minutes versus >30 minutes, there was no significant difference in the incidence of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, cord pH <7.10 and new born babies requiring immediate ventilation. But the need for admission to NICU in the group of D-D interval < or = 30 minutes was significantly higher compared to the other group where D-D interval was >30 minutes.
conclusionNon-reassuring fetal heart rate detected by CTG did not correlate well with adverse neonatal outcome. There was no significant difference in immediate adverse neonatal outcome whether the D-D time interval was < or = 30 minutes or >30 minutes; contrary to this, NICU admission for suspected birth asphyxia in </= 30 minutes group was significantly higher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.