Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19190594›Full record

ArticleNature clinical practice. Urology2009

Does pelvic floor muscle training prevent and treat urinary and fecal incontinence in pregnancy?

Kari Bø

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature clinical practice. Urology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05530681 (Correlation Pelvic Floor Function and Ultrasound Findings One Year After Childbirth), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05530681 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Correlation Pelvic Floor Function and Ultrasound Findings One Year After Childbirth

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2022 to 2025Enrolled320ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorders, Obstetric Trauma, Urinary Incontinence, Anal IncontinenceArmsQuestionnaire, Pelvic floor ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kari BøDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. kari.bo@nih.no

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the systematic review by Hay-Smith and colleagues, which investigated the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for preventing and treating urinary and fecal incontinence in pregnant and postnatal women. The authors concluded that antenatal PFMT improved continence outcomes during first pregnancy, and that PFMT represents an appropriate treatment for women with persistent postpartum incontinence. This systematic review is of high methodological quality. Nevertheless, the exclusion of studies with nonrandomized designs and the inclusion of large studies of weak interventions might have resulted in an underestimation of the effect of PFMT. The dose-response relationship is important in PFMT, and intensive training with close follow-up is required to achieve beneficial effects.

Identifiers

PMID19190594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.