Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19190166›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2009

Prospective evaluation of hepatitis B 1762(T)/1764(A) mutations on hepatocellular carcinoma development in Shanghai, China.

Jian-Min Yuan, Alex Ambinder, Yunhua Fan, Yu-Tang Gao, Mimi C Yu, John D Groopman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA markers in molecular diagnostics for hepatocellular carcinoma.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian-Min YuanThe Masonic Cancer Center and Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. jyuan@umn.edu
Alex Ambinder
Yunhua Fan
Yu-Tang Gao
Mimi C Yu
John D Groopman
Masonic Cancer CenterJohns Hopkins University · USShanghai Cancer Institute · CN

Funding

Validation and Application of Risk, Biomarkers in Human StudiesP01ES006052 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROOPMAN, JOHN D · 1993 to 2012
$22.6M
DIETARY FACTORS IN THE ETIOLOGY OF CANCER IN SHANGHAIR01CA043092 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI YUAN, JIAN-MIN · 1987 to 2006
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA043092NCI NIH HHS R01 CA43092NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES006052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most important risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, determinants of HCC risk in infected individuals are not well understood. We prospectively evaluated the association between acquired HBV 1762(T)/1764(A) double mutations and HCC risk among 49 incident HCC cases and 97 controls with seropositive hepatitis B surface antigen at baseline from a cohort of 18,244 men in Shanghai, China, enrolled during 1986 to 1989. Compared with HBV carriers without the mutations, chronic HBV carriers with the HBV 1762(T)/1764(A) double mutations experienced an elevated risk of HCC (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-5.85; P = 0.04). Risk increased with increasing copies of the double mutations; men with > or =500 copies/microL serum had an odds ratio of 14.57 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-87.98) relative to those without the double mutations (P(trend) = 0.004). Thus, the HBV 1762(T)/1764(A) double mutation is a codeterminant of HCC risk for people chronically infected with HBV.

Indexed as

MutationCarcinoma, HepatocellularCase-Control StudiesChinaHepatitis BHepatitis B virusHumansIncidenceLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19190166
PMCPMC2640440
OpenAlexW2042341265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.