Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19189218›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2010

Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review.

Gherardo Mazziotti, Andrea Giustina

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acromegaly and Bone: An Update.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gherardo MazziottiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, c/o Endocrinology Service, Montichiari Hospital, Via Ciotti 154, 25018, Montichiari, Italy. gherardomazziotti@hotmail.com
Andrea Giustina
University of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) are widely used for the treatment of acromegaly achieving biochemical control of the disease in 50-75% of the patients. One of the goals of the treatment of acromegaly is the control of tumor growth, especially in patients in whom SSAs are used as first-line therapy. Over the recent years, there has been growing evidence that SSAs are able to induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. However, most of the data are from patients under treatment with octreotide, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with long-acting formulation, whereas the data on lanreotide SR or Autogel are very few. Indeed, octreotide and lanreotide, i.e. the two commercially available SSAs, show slight differences in pharmacokinetics and patterns of receptor affinities with potentially different therapeutic effects. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature data concerning the shrinkage effects of long-acting lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. The analysis was focused on the following issues: differences in shrinkage effects between primary and secondary medical treatment, predictive value of baseline tumor volume and correlation between biochemical control and shrinkage effects. The peer-reviewed medical literature was searched to identify clinical trials studying the effects of lanreotide SR or Autogel on adenoma size in acromegaly. To be included in this analysis, studies had one of the following designs: randomized controlled trial; prospective, nonrandomized trial; retrospective study. Twenty-two studies were found to be eligible for the final analysis, in which tumor size was measured as an end-point for lanreotide treatment. Overall a total of 32.8% of patients experienced a variable degree (from 10 to 77%) of tumor shrinkage during lanreotide SR or Autogel treatment. The analysis showed that tumor shrinkage was more frequent in naïve patients as compared with those previously treated by radiotherapy, surgery or drugs other than lanreotide. The data on the correlation between tumor shrinkage and baseline tumor size were discordant, but when baseline tumor size was specified, more than 80% of patients undergoing shrinkage under lanreotide Autogel had macroadenomas. Finally, with lanreotide Autogel there was no evident correlation between biochemical response and tumor shrinkage. Our systematic review of the literature shows that lanreotide particularly when used as first-line therapy is able to quite frequently induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. This finding suggests that this drug may have a role in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAntineoplastic AgentsHumansOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatinTumor BurdenAntineoplastic AgentslanreotideOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID19189218
OpenAlexW1982626285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.