Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19188699›Full record

ReviewCytogenetic and genome research2008

Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

S Misri, S Pandita, R Kumar, T K Pandita

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. p16Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research Progress of Epigenetics in Pathogenesis and Treatment of Malignant Tumors].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mapping out p38MAPK.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MisriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
S Pandita
R Kumar
T K Pandita
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Tumor Cells Specific Targets for Combined Heat/RadiationP01CA104457 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROTI ROTI, JOSEPH L · 2004 to 2008
$8.4M
CHROMATIN MODIFYING FACTORS CONTROL RADIATION RESPONSE AND GENOMIC STABILITYR01CA129537 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 2008 to 2018
$3.3M
Functional Characterization of the Mammalian MOF Gene ProductR01CA123232 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA10445NCI NIH HHS CA123232NCI NIH HHS P01 CA104457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA123232NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic stability is maintained by telomeres, the end terminal structures that protect chromosomes from fusion or degradation. Shortening or loss of telomeric repeats or altered telomere chromatin structure is correlated with telomere dysfunction such as chromosome end-to-end associations that could lead to genomic instability and gene amplification. The structure at the end of telomeres is such that its DNA differs from DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), which is accomplished by forming a unique higher order nucleoprotein structure. Telomeres are attached to the nuclear matrix and have a unique chromatin structure. Whether this special structure is maintained by specific chromatin changes is yet to be thoroughly investigated. Chromatin modifications implicated in transcriptional regulation are thought to be the result of a code on the histone proteins (histone code). This code, involving phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation, and sumoylation of histones, is believed to regulate chromatin accessibility either by disrupting chromatin contacts or by recruiting non-histone proteins to chromatin. The histone code in which distinct histone tail-protein interactions promote engagement may be the deciding factor for choosing specific DSB repair pathways. Recent evidence suggests that such mechanisms are involved in DNA damage detection and repair. Altered telomere chromatin structure has been linked to defective DNA damage response (DDR), and eukaryotic cells have evolved DDR mechanisms utilizing proficient DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints in order to maintain genomic stability. Recent studies suggest that chromatin modifying factors play a critical role in the maintenance of genomic stability. This review will summarize the role of DNA damage repair proteins specifically ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and its effectors and the telomere complex in maintaining genome stability.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAcetylationAtaxia TelangiectasiaAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsGenomic InstabilityHistonesHumansMethylationPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRadiation, IonizingTelomereAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID19188699
PMCPMC2714185
OpenAlexW2022079791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.