Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19188464›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2009

Impact of quality strategies on hospital outputs.

R Suñol, P Vallejo, A Thompson, M J M H Lombarts, C D Shaw, N Klazinga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Article
  14. Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R SuñolAvedis Donabedian Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona 08037, Spain. fad@fadq.org
P Vallejo
A Thompson
M J M H Lombarts
C D Shaw
N Klazinga

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThis study was part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project on patients crossing borders, a study to investigate quality improvement strategies in healthcare systems across the European Union (EU).

aimTo explore the association between the implementation of quality improvement strategies in hospitals and hospitals' success in meeting defined quality requirements that are considered intermediate outputs of the care process.

methodsData regarding the implementation of seven quality improvement strategies (accreditation, organisational quality management programmes, audit and internal assessment of clinical standards, patient safety systems, clinical practice guidelines, performance indicators and systems for obtaining patients' views) and four dimensions of outputs (clinical, safety, patient-centredness and cross-border patient-centredness) were collected from 389 acute care hospitals in eight EU countries using a web-based questionnaire. In a second phase, 89 of these hospitals participated in an on-site audit by independent surveyors. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used to explore associations and relations between quality improvement strategies and achievement of outputs.

resultsPositive associations were found between six internal quality improvement strategies and hospital outputs. The quality improvement strategies could be reasonably subsumed under one latent index which explained about half of their variation. The analysis of outputs concluded that the outputs can also be considered part of a single construct. The findings indicate that the implementation of internal as well as external quality improvement strategies in hospitals has beneficial effects on the hospital outputs studied here.

conclusionThe implementation of internal quality improvement strategies as well as external assessment systems should be promoted.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareEuropeHealth Plan ImplementationHospitalsHumansInternationalityLinear ModelsPatient SatisfactionSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesTotal Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID19188464
PMCPMC2629927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.