Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19188394›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose, prolonged-infusion cefepime in adult critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Anthony M Nicasio, Robert E Ariano, Sheryl A Zelenitsky, Aryun Kim, Jared L Crandon, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02680600 (Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefepime Administrered Intravenously in Intensive Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02680600 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefepime Administrered Intravenously in Intensive Care Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorOnze Lieve Vrouw HospitalRan2014 to 2016Enrolled20ConditionsAntimicrobial TreatmentArmsCefepime dosing, Blood sampling, Urine sampling, Determination of renal markers, Population pharmacokinetic modeling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cefepime extended infusion versus intermittent infusion: Clinical and cost evaluation.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony M NicasioCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA. dnicola@harthosp.org
Robert E Ariano
Sheryl A Zelenitsky
Aryun Kim
Jared L Crandon
Joseph L Kuti
David P Nicolau
Hartford Hospital · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime was constructed from data from adult critical care patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). A total of 32 patients treated with high-dose cefepime, 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) or a renal function-adjusted equivalent dose, were randomized into two groups--26 for the initial model and 6 for model validation. Serum samples of cefepime were collected at steady state. Nonparametric adaptive grid population modeling was employed using a two-compartment K(slope) pharmacokinetic model relating the elimination rate constant (K(10)) to renal function, as defined by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), and central distribution volume (V(1)) to total body weight (TBW). The final model was described by the following equations: K(10) = 0.0027 x CL(CR) + 0.071 h(-1) and V(1) = TBW x 0.21 liter/kg. The median intercompartmental transfer constants K(12) and K(21) were 0.780 h(-1) and 0.472 h(-1), respectively. Using these median parameter estimates, the bias, precision, and coefficient of determination for the initial model were 11.3 microg/ml, 24.0 microg/ml, and 26%, respectively. The independent validation group displayed a bias, precision, and coefficient of determination of -1.64 microg/ml, 17.1 microg/ml, and 62%, respectively. Time-concentration profiles were assessed for various dosing regimens, using 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations. Among the regimens, the likelihoods of 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) achieving free drug concentrations above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval were 91.8%, 78.1%, and 50.3% for MICs of 8, 16, and 32 microg/ml, respectively. This study provides a pharmacokinetic model capable of predicting cefepime concentrations in critically ill patients with VAP.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeCephalosporinsCritical IllnessHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID19188394
PMCPMC2663089
OpenAlexW2106307190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.