ArticleAtencion primaria2009
[Family doctors and psychiatrists and the patient with depression: the need to re-adjust health care approaches and organisational dynamics].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Views of patients diagnosed with depression and cared for by general practitioners and psychiatrists].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Primary care and mental health care collaboration in patients with depression: Evaluation of a pilot experience].Atencion primariaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo find out the perceptions of family doctors (FD) and psychiatrists (PS) on their inter-relationships in the health care of patients with depression.
designQualitative methodology. Exploratory design based on FD and PS discussion groups (DG).
settingPrimary health care centres (PHCC) and mental health centres (MHC) of the Basque Country Health Service in Vizcaya. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTEXT: A total of 29 FD from 20 PHCC, and 13 PS from 11 MHC, distributed according to the socioeconomic level of the reference population. The meetings were arranged and held in the PC research unit.
methodsAn intentional sample to configure 4 DG of FD and 2 of PS, homogenous as regards socioeconomic level, and heterogeneous as regards the centres they came from, work experience and gender. The meetings were recorded and transcribed and a sociological discourse analysis was made. Triangulation between researchers and results comparison with the participants was carried out.
resultsThe perceptions and attitudes of the FD and PS differed, in their connections with the patient, expectations and health care context. In both cases they perceived the unsuitability of the real patient as regards the prefixed perceptions of the professional. The increase of the problem and its management seemed to be conditioned by a social medium which was uncontrolled, and due to increasing deficiencies in the collaboration between health care levels.
conclusionsCare of the patient with depression requires diagnostic and treatment approaches centred on the patient and shared by FD and PS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.