Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19185482›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2009

The diffusive interaction of microtubule binding proteins.

Jeremy R Cooper, Linda Wordeman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrafast Force-Clamp Spectroscopy of Microtubule-Binding Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What Are the Molecular Requirements for Protein Sliding along DNA?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tubulin tails and their modifications regulate protein diffusion on microtubules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy R CooperDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Linda Wordeman
University of Washington · US

Funding

Microtubule Dynamics and Chromosome SegregationR01GM069429 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WORDEMAN, LINDA · 2004 to 2020
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM69429NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubule-based motility is often thought of as specifically referring to the directed stepping of microtubule-based motors such as kinesin or dynein. However, microtubule lattice diffusion (also known as diffusional motility) provides a second mode of transport that is shared by a much broader class of microtubule binding proteins. Microtubule lattice diffusion offers distinct advantages as a transport mechanism including speed, bidirectional microtubule end targeting, and no requirement for direct chemical energy (i.e. ATP). It remains to be seen whether a universal binding mechanism for this interaction will be identified but electrostatic interactions appear to play a significant role. In the meantime, the well-studied subject of DNA binding proteins that diffuse along the DNA backbone provides an insightful analog for understanding the nature of microtubule-based diffusional motility.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsMicrotubule ProteinsMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalDNA-Binding ProteinsMicrotubule Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19185482
PMCPMC2670775
OpenAlexW2116462854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.