ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2009
Quantitative variation of LINE-1 sequences in five species and three subspecies of the subgenus Mus and in five Robertsonian races of Mus musculus domesticus.
Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Conversion of DNA Sequences: From a Transposable Element to a Tandem Repeat or to a Gene.Genes · 2019Review
- Centromeric enrichment of LINE-1 retrotransposons and its significance for the chromosome evolution of Phyllostomid bats.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017Article
- LINE-1 distribution in six rodent genomes follow a species-specific pattern.Journal of genetics · 2016Article
- Identification and chromosome mapping of repetitive elements in the Astyanax scabripinnis (Teleostei: Characidae) species complex.Genetica · 2015Article
- Review
- Evolution of the structure and composition of house mouse satellite DNA sequences in the subgenus Mus (Rodentia: Muridea): a cytogenomic approach.Chromosoma · 2013Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantitative variation of a conserved region of the LINE-1 ORF2 sequence was determined in eight species and subspecies of the subgenus Mus (M. m. domesticus, M. m. musculus, M. m. castaneus, M. spicilegus, M. spretus, M. cervicolor, M. cookii, M. caroli) and five Robertsonian races of M. m. domesticus. No differences in LINE-1 ORF2 content were found between all acrocentric or Robertsonian chromosome races, whereas the quantitative variation of the LINE-1 ORF2 sequences detected among the eight taxa partly matches with the clades into which the subgenus is divided. An accumulation of LINE-1 ORF2 elements likely occurred during the evolution of the subgenus. Within the Asiatic clade, M. cervicolor, cookii, and caroli show a low quantity of LINE-1 sequences, also detected within the Palearctic clade in M. m. castaneus and M. spretus, representing perhaps the ancestral condition within the subgenus. On the other hand, M. m. domesticus, M. m. musculus and M. spicilegus showed a high content of LINE-1 ORF2 sequences. Comparison between the chromosomal hybridization pattern of M. m. domesticus, which possesses the highest content, and M. spicilegus did not show any difference in the LINE-1 ORF2 distribution, suggesting that the quantitative variation of this sequence family did not involve chromosome restructuring or a preferential chromosome accumulation, during the evolution of M. m. domesticus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.