Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19184451›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2009

Predicting pharmacokinetics of drugs using physiologically based modeling--application to food effects.

N Parrott, V Lukacova, G Fraczkiewicz, M B Bolger

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surge DosePharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inferring Therapeutic Targets inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N ParrottPharmaceuticals Division, Pharma Research Non-Clinical Development, Non-Clinical Drug Safety, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. neil_john.parrott@roche.com
V Lukacova
G Fraczkiewicz
M B Bolger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of the major mechanisms underlying the effect of food on drug absorption allows reliable qualitative prediction based on biopharmaceutical properties, which can be assessed during the pre-clinical phase of drug discovery. Furthermore, several recent examples have shown that physiologically based absorption models incorporating biorelevant drug solubility measurements can provide quite accurate quantitative prediction of food effect. However, many molecules currently in development have distinctly sub-optimal biopharmaceutical properties, making the quantitative prediction of food effect for different formulations from in vitro data very challenging. If such drugs reach clinical development and show undesirable variability when dosed with food, improved formulation can help to reduce the food effect and carefully designed in vivo studies in dogs can be a useful guide to clinical formulation development. Even so, such in vivo studies provide limited throughput for screening, and food effects seen in dog cannot always be directly translated to human. This paper describes how physiologically based absorption modeling can play a role in the prediction of food effect by integrating the data generated during pre-clinical and clinical research and development. Such data include physicochemical and in vitro drug properties, biorelevant solubility and dissolution, and in vivo pre-clinical and clinical pharmacokinetic data. Some background to current physiological absorption models of human and dog is given, and refinements to models of in vivo drug solubility and dissolution are described. These are illustrated with examples using GastroPlus to simulate the food effect in dog and human for different formulations of two marketed drugs.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFood-Drug InteractionsModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAprepitantCell Line, TumorChemical PrecipitationChemistry, PharmaceuticalColonic NeoplasmsDogsEatingFastingFemaleGastrointestinal ContentsAprepitantMorpholinesTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID19184451
PMCPMC2664880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.