Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2009
Reaction time to peripheral visual stimuli during exercise under normoxia and hyperoxia.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does cerebral oxygenation affect cognitive function during exercise?European journal of applied physiology · 2011Trial
- Impact of two different periodized aerobic training on acute cerebrovascular response and cognitive performance in coronary heart disease patients.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Effects of Acute Aerobic Exercise on Cognition and Constructs of Decision-Making in Adults With and Without Hypertension.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Article
- The Impact of Hyperoxia on Human Performance and Recovery.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test if increased oxygen availability affected simple reaction time (RT) to peripheral visual stimuli during exercise. Twelve male participants performed RT tasks at rest, during cycling with three different workloads (100, 150, and 200 W), and after exercise. We fractionated RT into Premotor time and Motor time. Under normoxia, Premotor time significantly increased during exercise at 200 W (mean +/- SD, 224.7 +/- 34.8 ms) relative to that at rest (213.3 +/- 34.1 ms) (P < 0.05). In contrast, we found no difference in Premotor time between at rest (214.0 +/- 27.0 ms) and at 200 W (213.0 +/- 21.6 ms) under hyperoxia. Furthermore, Premotor time significantly decreased at 150 W (201.3 +/- 22.4 ms) relative to that at rest under hyperoxia (P < 0.05). These results suggest that increased oxygen availability during exercise has beneficial effects on perceptual performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19184086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.