Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19184023›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2009

[Immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: differential diagnosis of epithelial breast lesions].

W Böcker, D Hungermann, S Weigel, J Tio, T Decker

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W BöckerGerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagk-Str. 17, 48159, Münster, Deutschland. werner.boecker@ukmuenster.de
D Hungermann
S Weigel
J Tio
T Decker
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proliferative epithelial breast lesions include a wide variety of benign hyperplastic and noninvasive neoplastic lesions, as well as invasive carcinomas. Mammographically these lesions may show microcalcifications, architectural distortions or mass lesions. The task of the pathologist begins with a preoperative diagnosis by means of minimally invasive biopsy. His diagnosis forms the basis for not only the radiological-pathological correlation diagnosis, but also for the management of benign proliferative breast disease lesions, as well as therapeutic decisions in the case of malignant lesions.In daily practice, immunohistochemistry is the method of choice for clarifying difficult cases. The aim of this chapter is to describe the relevant markers in breast pathology and to provide an algorithmic approach to different proliferative breast disease lesions.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaBiomarkersBiopsyBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, LobularDiagnosis, DifferentialEpitheliumFemaleFibrocystic Breast DiseaseHumansHyperplasiaImmunohistochemistryKeratinsBiomarkersKeratins

Identifiers

PMID19184023
OpenAlexW20097642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.