Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19183950›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2009

Determining small intestinal transit time and pathomorphology in critically ill patients using video capsule technology.

Stefan Rauch, Kristine Krueger, Alparslan Turan, Norbert Roewer, Daniel I Sessler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Variation in small bowel transit time on capsule endoscopy.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan RauchDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. s0rauc01@louisville.edu
Kristine Krueger
Alparslan Turan
Norbert Roewer
Daniel I Sessler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastrointestinal motility can be impaired by serious illness or medications, compromising enteral feeding in critical care patients. We compared small bowel transit time and morphology in neurosurgical critical care (ICU) patients with those in healthy subjects.

methodsWe evaluated small intestinal transit time, quality of visualization and intestinal morphology in 16 ICU patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score from 6 to 14) and 16 healthy ambulatory patients. Video data were obtained with PillCam SB capsules (Given Imaging Ltd., Yoqneam, Israel).

resultsTransit time was 5.1 h (3.9-7.7) (median [IQR]) in ICU and 4.3 (4.1-5.3 h) in ambulatory patients (P = 0.481). Six ICU patients (37%) and two ambulatory patients (12%) had pathological findings (ulcers, petechia, erosions) (P = 0.10).

conclusionsMedian small bowel transit times in critically ill neurosurgical patients were similar to those in ambulatory subjects, although transit times were more variable in the critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopesCritical IllnessAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal MotilityHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.