ReviewDer Radiologe2009
[Arterial embolization of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transarterial embolization combined with octreotide long-acting release in treating rectal neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a single-institutional experience.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Intra-arterial therapy of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases: comparing conventional TACE, drug-eluting beads TACE and yttrium-90 radioembolisation as treatment options using a propensity score analysis model.European radiology · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors are slowly growing neoplasms and 75% of patients already present with hepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis. Size and growth of liver metastases is of prognostic value. Due to arterial vascularization of metastases, transarterial embolization (TAE) is a suitable procedure, which can also be combined with chemotherapeutic agents. Indications for embolization or chemoembolization (TACE) are growth of liver metastases or inadequate symptom control. The majority of patients show clinical improvement and partial remission can be achieved in 50% of cases with 5-year survival rates of 50-60%. Response rates, survival or complications are not dependent on the embolization technique (TAE or TACE). Embolization is usually performed in several sessions depending on individual tumor stage and disease progression. Embolization is a cost-effective procedure and is included in the treatment algorithm of international guidelines. Therefore, evaluation of new embolization therapies must be evaluated in randomized controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19183927What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.