ArticleChinese medicine2009
Minimal acupuncture is not a valid placebo control in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: a physiologist's perspective.
Article in Chinese medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is the location of the needling point in sham acupuncture for tension-type headache associated with outcomes? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Acupuncture for Chronic Pain Management in Haemophilic Arthropathy: A Systematic Review.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Pooled it
- Does the outcome of acupuncture differ according to the location of sham needling points in acupuncture trials for migraine? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of sham acupuncture validation studies.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Pooled it
- Needling Point Location Used in Sham Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Research in nursing & health · 2023Pooled it
- An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Infertile Women UndergoingFrontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Acupuncture vs. Pharmacological Prophylaxis of Migraine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- The effects of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Sham Electroacupuncture Methods in Randomized Controlled Trials.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Acupuncture for cancer pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Sham Acupressure Controls Used in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Critique.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Acupuncture and related interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Acupuncture and other physical treatments for the relief of pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: network meta-analysis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2013Pooled it
- Effectiveness of physical therapy techniques and methods in the management of endometriosis symptoms: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Acupuncture for acute treatment of migraine without aura: A randomized clinical trial.Headache · 2026Trial
- Acupuncture and Sleep Quality Among Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for functional constipation: a randomised, sham-controlled pilot trial.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Trial
- Acupuncture as prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a protocol for a single-blinded, double-dummy randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2018Trial
- Psychophysical responses in patients receiving a mock laser within context of an acupuncture clinical trial: an interoceptive perspective.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2017Trial
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Placebo-control of acupuncture is used to evaluate and distinguish between the specific effects and the non-specific ones. During 'true' acupuncture treatment in general, the needles are inserted into acupoints and stimulated until deqi is evoked. In contrast, during placebo acupuncture, the needles are inserted into non-acupoints and/or superficially (so-called minimal acupuncture). A sham acupuncture needle with a blunt tip may be used in placebo acupuncture. Both minimal acupuncture and the placebo acupuncture with the sham acupuncture needle touching the skin would evoke activity in cutaneous afferent nerves. This afferent nerve activity has pronounced effects on the functional connectivity in the brain resulting in a 'limbic touch response'. Clinical studies showed that both acupuncture and minimal acupuncture procedures induced significant alleviation of migraine and that both procedures were equally effective. In other conditions such as low back pain and knee osteoarthritis, acupuncture was found to be more potent than minimal acupuncture and conventional non-acupuncture treatment. It is probable that the responses to 'true' acupuncture and minimal acupuncture are dependent on the aetiology of the pain. Furthermore, patients and healthy individuals may have different responses. In this paper, we argue that minimal acupuncture is not valid as an inert placebo-control despite its conceptual brilliance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.