Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19182785›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2009

Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome.

Ian W Taylor, Rune Linding, David Warde-Farley, Yongmei Liu, Catia Pesquita, Daniel Faria, Shelley Bull, Tony Pawson, Quaid Morris, Jeffrey L Wrana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 359 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
359citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

359 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Machine learning-based prediction of dynamic heterosis for plant height with pathway biomarkers in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

299 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ian W TaylorSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
Rune Linding
David Warde-Farley
Yongmei Liu
Catia Pesquita
Daniel Faria
Shelley Bull
Tony Pawson
Quaid Morris
Jeffrey L Wrana

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in the biochemical wiring of oncogenic cells drives phenotypic transformations that directly affect disease outcome. Here we examine the dynamic structure of the human protein interaction network (interactome) to determine whether changes in the organization of the interactome can be used to predict patient outcome. An analysis of hub proteins identified intermodular hub proteins that are co-expressed with their interacting partners in a tissue-restricted manner and intramodular hub proteins that are co-expressed with their interacting partners in all or most tissues. Substantial differences in biochemical structure were observed between the two types of hubs. Signaling domains were found more often in intermodular hub proteins, which were also more frequently associated with oncogenesis. Analysis of two breast cancer patient cohorts revealed that altered modularity of the human interactome may be useful as an indicator of breast cancer prognosis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasm ProteinsPrognosisProtein Interaction MappingReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSignal TransductionStatistics, NonparametricBRAP protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID19182785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.