Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19182518›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2009

Balancing the decision of cell proliferation and cell fate.

Timothy C Hallstrom, Joseph R Nevins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Regulatory Role of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy C HallstromDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Joseph R Nevins
Duke University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of E2F SpecificityR01CA104663 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NEVINS, JOSEPH R · 2003 to 2012
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of cellular proliferation is key in the proper development of a complex organism, the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and the ability to respond to various hormonal and other inducers. Key in the control of proliferation is the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein which regulates the activity of a family of transcription factors known as E2Fs. The E2F proteins are now recognized to regulate the expression of a large number of genes associated with cell proliferation including genes encoding DNA replication as well as mitotic activities. What has also become clear over the past several years is the intimate relationship between the control of cell proliferation and the control of cell fate, particularly the activation of apoptotic pathways. Central in this connection is the Rb/E2F pathway that not only provides the primary signals for proliferation but at the same time, connects with the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. This review addresses this inter-connection and the molecular mechanisms that control the decision between proliferation and cell death.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAnimalsApoptosisE2F Transcription FactorsGene Expression RegulationHumansNeoplasmsProtein IsoformsRetinoblastoma ProteinE2F Transcription FactorsProtein IsoformsRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID19182518
PMCPMC3018328
OpenAlexW2056777995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.