Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19181860›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Transcriptome-guided characterization of genomic rearrangements in a breast cancer cell line.

Qi Zhao, Otavia L Caballero, Samuel Levy, Brian J Stevenson, Christian Iseli, Sandro J de Souza, Pedro A Galante, Dana Busam, Margaret A Leversha, Kalyani Chadalavada and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MicroRNAs in the pathobiology of sarcomas.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Qi ZhaoJ. Craig Venter Institute, 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Otavia L Caballero
Samuel Levy
Brian J Stevenson
Christian Iseli
Sandro J de Souza
Pedro A Galante
Dana Busam
Margaret A Leversha
Kalyani Chadalavada
Yu-Hui Rogers
J Craig Venter
Andrew J G Simpson
Robert L Strausberg

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have identified new genomic alterations in the breast cancer cell line HCC1954, using high-throughput transcriptome sequencing. With 120 Mb of cDNA sequences, we were able to identify genomic rearrangement events leading to fusions or truncations of genes including MRE11 and NSD1, genes already implicated in oncogenesis, and 7 rearrangements involving other additional genes. This approach demonstrates that high-throughput transcriptome sequencing is an effective strategy for the characterization of genomic rearrangements in cancers.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementBase SequenceBreast NeoplasmsCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansMRE11 Homologue ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsNsd1 protein, mouseNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19181860
PMCPMC2633215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.