Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19181848›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Type III restriction enzymes communicate in 1D without looping between their target sites.

Subramanian P Ramanathan, Kara van Aelst, Alice Sears, Luke J Peakman, Fiona M Diffin, Mark D Szczelkun, Ralf Seidel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Switching roles for a helicase.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single-molecule nanometry for biological physics.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Subramanian P RamanathanBIOTEChnology Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Kara van Aelst
Alice Sears
Luke J Peakman
Fiona M Diffin
Mark D Szczelkun
Ralf Seidel

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 067439Wellcome Trust 084086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To cleave DNA, Type III restriction enzymes must communicate the relative orientation of two asymmetric recognition sites over hundreds of base pairs. The basis of this long-distance communication, for which ATP hydrolysis by their helicase domains is required, is poorly understood. Several conflicting DNA-looping mechanisms have been proposed, driven either by active DNA translocation or passive 3D diffusion. Using single-molecule DNA stretching in combination with bulk-solution assays, we provide evidence that looping is both highly unlikely and unnecessary, and that communication is strictly confined to a 1D route. Integrating our results with previous data, a simple communication scheme is concluded based on 1D diffusion along DNA.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalBinding SitesDeoxyribonucleases, Type III Site-SpecificDiffusionDNAHydrolysisNucleic Acid ConformationOptical TweezersSubstrate SpecificityDeoxyribonucleases, Type III Site-SpecificDNA

Identifiers

PMID19181848
PMCPMC2633214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.