Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19180095›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2009

The molecular programme of tumour reversion: the steps beyond malignant transformation.

Adam Telerman, Robert Amson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Control of Cellular Differentiation Trajectories for Cancer Reversion.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. UsingCells · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Tctp, a unique Ing5-binding partner, inhibits the chromatin binding of Enok inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam TelermanLBPA, UMR 8113, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 61 Avenue du Président Wilson, 94235 Cachan, France. adam.telerman@lbpa.ens-cachan.fr
Robert Amson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How cells become malignant has preoccupied scientists for over a century. However, the converse question is also valid: are tumour cells capable of reverting from their malignant state? Askanazy's studies in 1907 indicated that teratoma cells could differentiate into normal somatic tissues and current evidence indicates that some tumour cells have acquired the molecular circuitry that results in the negation of chromosomal instability, translocations, oncogene activation and loss of tumour suppressor genes. Studying these extremely rare events of tumour reversion and deciphering these pathways, which involve SIAH1, presenilin 1, TSAP6 and translationally controlled tumour protein (TCTP), could lead to new avenues in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsOxidoreductasesPresenilin-1Seven in Absentia ProteinsTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsOxidoreductasesPresenilin-1Seven in Absentia ProteinsSTEAP3 protein, humanTPT1 protein, humanTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID19180095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.