ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Protein domain organisation: adding order.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vector semantics of multidomain protein architectures.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- FAS: assessing the similarity between proteins using multi-layered feature architectures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A review of visualisations of protein fold networks and their relationship with sequence and function.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Review
- Article
- Identification of New Toxicity Mechanisms in Drug-Induced Liver Injury through Systems Pharmacology.Genes · 2022Article
- Simulating domain architecture evolution.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Discovering molecular features of intrinsically disordered regions by using evolution for contrastive learning.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Systematic analysis of CCCH zinc finger family in Brassica napus showed that BnRR-TZFs are involved in stress resistance.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- GrAPFI: predicting enzymatic function of proteins from domain similarity graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- The modular nature of protein evolution: domain rearrangement rates across eukaryotic life.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- DIFFUSE: predicting isoform functions from sequences and expression profiles via deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- MultiDomainBenchmark: a multi-domain query and subject database suite.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Structural and Functional View of Polypharmacology.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Evolution of Protein Domain Repeats in Metazoa.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- UniProt-DAAC: domain architecture alignment and classification, a new method for automatic functional annotation in UniProtKB.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Protein domain architectures provide a fast, efficient and scalable alternative to sequence-based methods for comparative functional genomics.F1000Research · 2016Article
- The language of the protein universe.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
- Domain similarity based orthology detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Event inference in multidomain families with phylogenetic reconciliation.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- The robustness of a signaling complex to domain rearrangements facilitates network evolution.PLoS biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDomains are the building blocks of proteins. During evolution, they have been duplicated, fused and recombined, to produce proteins with novel structures and functions. Structural and genome-scale studies have shown that pairs or groups of domains observed together in a protein are almost always found in only one N to C terminal order and are the result of a single recombination event that has been propagated by duplication of the multi-domain unit. Previous studies of domain organisation have used graph theory to represent the co-occurrence of domains within proteins. We build on this approach by adding directionality to the graphs and connecting nodes based on their relative order in the protein. Most of the time, the linear order of domains is conserved. However, using the directed graph representation we have identified non-linear features of domain organization that are over-represented in genomes. Recognising these patterns and unravelling how they have arisen may allow us to understand the functional relationships between domains and understand how the protein repertoire has evolved.
resultsWe identify groups of domains that are not linearly conserved, but instead have been shuffled during evolution so that they occur in multiple different orders. We consider 192 genomes across all three kingdoms of life and use domain and protein annotation to understand their functional significance. To identify these features and assess their statistical significance, we represent the linear order of domains in proteins as a directed graph and apply graph theoretical methods. We describe two higher-order patterns of domain organisation: clusters and bi-directionally associated domain pairs and explore their functional importance and phylogenetic conservation.
conclusionTaking into account the order of domains, we have derived a novel picture of global protein organization. We found that all genomes have a higher than expected degree of clustering and more domain pairs in forward and reverse orientation in different proteins relative to random graphs with identical degree distributions. While these features were statistically over-represented, they are still fairly rare. Looking in detail at the proteins involved, we found strong functional relationships within each cluster. In addition, the domains tended to be involved in protein-protein interaction and are able to function as independent structural units. A particularly striking example was the human Jak-STAT signalling pathway which makes use of a set of domains in a range of orders and orientations to provide nuanced signaling functionality. This illustrated the importance of functional and structural constraints (or lack thereof) on domain organisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.