Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19177064›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2009

Data-driven methods to discover molecular determinants of serious adverse drug events.

A P Chiang, A J Butte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular therapy drives patient-centric health care paradigms.Clinical and translational science · 2010
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A P ChiangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
A J Butte

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Repositioning drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancerR01GM079719 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079719NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033NLM NIH HHS T15LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dangers of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) are well known to clinicians, pharmacologists, and the lay public. Efforts to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind SADRs have made significant progress through genetics and gene expression measurements. However, as the field of pharmacology adopts the same novel higher-density measurement modalities that have proven successful in other areas of biology, one wonders whether there can be more ways to benefit from the explosion of data created by these tools. The development of analytic tools and algorithms to interpret these biological data to create tools for medicine is central to the field of translational bioinformatics. In this review we introduce some of the types of SADR predictors that are required, and we discuss several databases that are publicly available for the study of SADRs, ranging from clinical to molecular measurements. We also describe recent examples of how bioinformatics methods coupled with data repositories can advance the science of SADRs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrescription DrugsRisk FactorsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID19177064
PMCPMC2726746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.