Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19176692›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2009

Francisella tularensis infection-derived monoclonal antibodies provide detection, protection, and therapy.

Anne G Savitt, Patricio Mena-Taboada, Gloria Monsalve, Jorge L Benach

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Circulating T Cells Are Not Sufficient for Protective Immunity against VirulentJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cat-bite-inducedJMM case reports · 2017
    Article
  13. Differential Growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New therapeutic approaches for treatment of tularaemia: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne G SavittCenter for Infectious Disease, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5120, USA.
Patricio Mena-Taboada
Gloria Monsalve
Jorge L Benach
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LIPKIN, W. IAN · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
Virulence Mechanism of Y. pestis and tularensisP01AI055621 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BENACH, JORGE L. · 2004 to 2010
$20.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI055621NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI 057158NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia and a potential agent of biowarfare. As an easily transmissible infectious agent, rapid detection and treatment are necessary to provide a positive clinical outcome. As an agent of biowarfare, there is an additional need to prevent infection. We made monoclonal antibodies to the F. tularensis subsp. holarctica live vaccine strain (F. tularensis LVS) by infecting mice with a sublethal dose of bacteria and, following recovery, by boosting the mice with sonicated organisms. The response to the initial and primary infection was restricted to immunoglobulin M antibody directed solely against lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After boosting with sonicated organisms, the specificity repertoire broadened against protein antigens, including DnaK, LpnA, FopA, bacterioferritin, the 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12, and metabolic enzymes. These monoclonal antibodies detect F. tularensis LVS by routine immunoassays, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blot analysis, and immunofluorescence. The ability of the antibodies to protect mice from intradermal infection, both prophylactically and therapeutically, was examined. An antibody to LPS which provides complete protection from infection with F. tularensis LVS and partial protection from infection with F. tularensis subsp. tularensis strain SchuS4 was identified. There was no bacteremia and reduced organ burden within the first 24 h when mice were protected from F. tularensis LVS infection with the anti-LPS antibody. No antibody that provided complete protection when administered therapeutically was identified; however, passive transfer of antibodies against LPS, FopA, and LpnA resulted in 40 to 50% survival of mice infected with F. tularensis LVS.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBacteremiaBlotting, WesternColony Count, MicrobialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectFrancisella tularensisImmunization, PassiveLiverMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSpleenSurvival AnalysisTularemiaAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID19176692
PMCPMC2650858
OpenAlexW2124279100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.