ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009
A flexible rank-based framework for detecting copy number aberrations from array data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FISH Oracle: a web server for flexible visualization of DNA copy number data in a genomic context.Journal of clinical bioinformatics · 2011Article
- A multi-sample based method for identifying common CNVs in normal human genomic structure using high-resolution aCGH data.PloS one · 2011Article
- SnoopCGH: software for visualizing comparative genomic hybridization data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDNA copy number aberration--both inherited and sporadic--is a significant contributor to a variety of human diseases. Copy number characterization is therefore an area of intense research. Probe hybridization-based arrays are important tools used to measure copy number in a high-throughput manner.
resultsIn this article, we present a simple but powerful nonparametric rank-based approach to detect deletions and gains from raw array copy number measurements. We use three different rank-based statistics to detect three separate molecular phenomena-somatic lesions, germline deletions and germline gains. The approach is robust and rigorously grounded in statistical theory, thereby enabling the meaningful assignment of statistical significance to each putative aberration. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by applying it to data from three different array platforms. We show that our method compares favorably with established approaches by applying it to published well-characterized samples. Power simulations demonstrate exquisite sensitivity for array data of reasonable quality.
conclusionsOur flexible rank-based framework is suitable for multiple platforms including single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and array comparative genomic hybridization, and can reliably detect gains or losses of genomic DNA, whether inherited, de novo, or somatic. AVAILABILITY: An R package RankCopy containing the methods described here, and is freely available from the author's web site (http://mendel.gene.cwru.edu/laframboiselab/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.