Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19176519›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2009

A complex-based reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interactome.

Haidong Wang, Boyko Kakaradov, Sean R Collins, Lena Karotki, Dorothea Fiedler, Michael Shales, Kevan M Shokat, Tobias C Walther, Nevan J Krogan, Daphne Koller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Predicting physical interactions between protein complexes.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haidong WangComputer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Boyko Kakaradov
Sean R Collins
Lena Karotki
Dorothea Fiedler
Michael Shales
Kevan M Shokat
Tobias C Walther
Nevan J Krogan
Daphne Koller

Funding

Genetic Analysis of the Nucleosome and RNA Polymerase II: A Systems ApproachR01GM084448 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2012
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cellular processes are performed by proteomic units that interact with each other. These units are often stoichiometrically stable complexes comprised of several proteins. To obtain a faithful view of the protein interactome we must view it in terms of these basic units (complexes and proteins) and the interactions between them. This study makes two contributions toward this goal. First, it provides a new algorithm for reconstruction of stable complexes from a variety of heterogeneous biological assays; our approach combines state-of-the-art machine learning methods with a novel hierarchical clustering algorithm that allows clusters to overlap. We demonstrate that our approach constructs over 40% more known complexes than other recent methods and that the complexes it produces are more biologically coherent even compared with the reference set. We provide experimental support for some of our novel predictions, identifying both a new complex involved in nutrient starvation and a new component of the eisosome complex. Second, we provide a high accuracy algorithm for the novel problem of predicting transient interactions involving complexes. We show that our complex level network, which we call ComplexNet, provides novel insights regarding the protein-protein interaction network. In particular, we reinterpret the finding that "hubs" in the network are enriched for being essential, showing instead that essential proteins tend to be clustered together in essential complexes and that these essential complexes tend to be large.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFungal ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein BindingProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesFungal ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID19176519
PMCPMC2690481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.