Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19176442›Full record

ArticleJAMA2009

Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Kevin C Oeffinger, Jennifer S Ford, Chaya S Moskowitz, Lisa R Diller, Melissa M Hudson, Joanne F Chou, Stephanie M Smith, Ann C Mertens, Tara O Henderson, Debra L Friedman and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Promoting Breast Cancer Surveillance: The EMPOWER Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Attendance at survivorship clinics in relation to Hodgkin lymphoma survivor and treatment characteristics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Longitudinal adherence to surveillance for late effects of cancer treatment: a population-based study of adult survivors of childhood cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Coverage for evidence-based cancer survivorship care services.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin C OeffingerDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA. oeffingk@mskcc.org
Jennifer S Ford
Chaya S Moskowitz
Lisa R Diller
Melissa M Hudson
Joanne F Chou
Stephanie M Smith
Ann C Mertens
Tara O Henderson
Debra L Friedman
Wendy M Leisenring
Leslie L Robison
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
Mammography and High-Risk Survivors of Pediatric CancerR21CA106972 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI OEFFINGER, KEVIN CHARLES · 2004 to 2005
$354k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA106972NCI NIH HHS R21-CA-106972NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727NCI NIH HHS U24-CA-55727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextWomen treated with chest radiation for a pediatric malignancy have a significantly increased risk of breast cancer at a young age and are recommended to have an annual screening mammogram starting at age 25 years or 8 years after radiation, whichever occurs last.

objectiveTo characterize the breast cancer surveillance practices among female pediatric cancer survivors who were treated with chest radiation and identify correlates of screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsBetween June 2005 and August 2006, a 114-item questionnaire was administered to a random sample of 625 women aged 25 through 50 years who had survived pediatric cancer, who had been treated with chest radiation, and who were participating in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), a North American cohort of long-term survivors diagnosed from 1970-1986. Comparisons were made with similarly aged pediatric cancer survivors not treated with chest radiation (n = 639) and the CCSS siblings cohort (n = 712).

main outcome measureScreening mammogram within the previous 2 years.

resultsOf 1976 cancer survivors and siblings who were contacted, 87.9% participated. Among the 551 women with a history of chest radiation, 55% reported a screening mammogram in the past 2 years (ages 25-39 years, 36.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.0%-42.0%; ages 40-50 years, 76.5%; 95% CI, 71.3%-81.7%). In comparison, 40.5% of survivors without chest radiation and 37.0% of CCSS siblings reported a screening mammogram in the same time interval. Notably, among women with a history of chest radiation, 47.3% (95% CI; 41.6%-53.0%) of those younger than 40 years had never had a mammogram and only 52.6% (95% CI; 46.4%-58.8%) of women aged 40 through 50 years were being regularly screened (2 mammograms within 4 years). Screening rates were higher among women who reported a physician recommendation than those who did not (ages 25-39 years, 76.0% vs 17.6%; ages 40-50 years, 87.3% vs 58.3%). In multivariate models, the association was particularly strong for younger women (ages 25-39 years, prevalence ratio [PR], 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.0; ages 40-50 years, PR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6).

conclusionsIn this cohort of women who had childhood cancer treated with chest radiation, 63.5% of those aged 25 through 39 years and 23.5% of those aged 40 through 50 years had not had mammography screening for breast cancer within the previous 2 years despite a guideline recommendation that survivors of childhood cancer who were treated with chest radiation should undergo annual screening mammography.

Indexed as

MammographyAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceBreast NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNorth America

Identifiers

PMID19176442
PMCPMC2676434
OpenAlexW2106735450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.