Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19173612›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2009

Temporal analysis of neural differentiation using quantitative proteomics.

Raghothama Chaerkady, Candace L Kerr, Arivusudar Marimuthu, Dhanashree S Kelkar, Manoj Kumar Kashyap, Marjan Gucek, John D Gearhart, Akhilesh Pandey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) and Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Proteomic analysis of stem cell differentiation and early development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raghothama ChaerkadyInstitute of Bioinformatics, International Technology Park, Bangalore, 560066, India. Raghothama@ibioinformatics.org
Candace L Kerr
Arivusudar Marimuthu
Dhanashree S Kelkar
Manoj Kumar Kashyap
Marjan Gucek
John D Gearhart
Akhilesh Pandey
Institute of Bioinformatics · INJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TCP5: ACTIVE SITE LABELING REAGENT FOR ACETYLTRANSFERASESU54RR020839 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR 020839NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to derive neural progenitors, differentiated neurons and glial cells from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) with high efficiency holds promise for a number of clinical applications. However, investigating the temporal events is crucial for defining the underlying mechanisms that drive this process of differentiation along different lineages. We carried out quantitative proteomic profiling using a multiplexed approach capable of analyzing eight different samples simultaneously to monitor the temporal dynamics of protein abundance as human embryonic stem cells differentiate into motor neurons or astrocytes. With this approach, a catalog of approximately 1200 proteins along with their relative quantitative expression patterns was generated. The differential expression of the large majority of these proteins has not previously been reported or studied in the context of neural differentiation. As expected, two of the widely used markers of pluripotency, alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) and LIN28, were found to be downregulated during differentiation, while S-100 and tenascin C were upregulated in astrocytes. Neurofilament 3 protein, doublecortin and CAM kinase-like 1 and nestin proteins were upregulated during motor neuron differentiation. We identified a number of proteins whose expression was largely confined to specific cell types, embryonic stem cells, embryoid bodies and differentiating motor neurons. For example, glycogen phosphorylase (PYGL) and fatty acid binding protein 5 (FABP5) were enriched in ESCs, while beta spectrin (SPTBN5) was highly expressed in embryoid bodies. Karyopherin, heat shock 27 kDa protein 1 and cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (CRABP2) were upregulated in differentiating motor neurons but were downregulated in mature motor neurons. We validated some of the novel markers of the differentiation process using immunoblotting and immunocytochemical labeling. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale temporal proteomic profiling of human stem cell differentiation into neural cell types highlighting proteins with limited or undefined roles in neural fate.

Indexed as

Antigens, DifferentiationCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNeurogenesisProteomeAntigens, DifferentiationProteome

Identifiers

PMID19173612
PMCPMC2693473
OpenAlexW2033469836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.