Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19173437›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2009

Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Adam Q Bauer, Christian C Anderson, Mark R Holland, James G Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam Q BauerWashington University, Physics, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Christian C Anderson
Mark R Holland
James G Miller

Funding

ANISOTROPY IN MYOCARDIAL ULTRASOUNDR37HL040302 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, JAMES GEGAN · 1998 to 2007
$2.2M
COMPENSATING FOR ANISOTROPY IN MYOCARDIAL ULTRASOUNDR01HL040302 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, JAMES GEGAN · 1988 to 2011
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL040302NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL040302NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL040302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that phase cancellation at the receiving transducer can result in the overestimation of the frequency dependent ultrasonic attenuation of bone, a quantity that has been shown to correlate with bone mineral density and ultimately with osteoporotic fracture risk. Evidence supporting this interpretation is provided by phase insensitive processing of the data, which appear to reduce the apparent overestimates of attenuation. The present study was designed to clarify the components underlying phase aberration artifacts in such through-transmission measurements by conducting systematic studies of the simplest possible test objects capable of introducing phase aberration. Experimental results are presented for a Lexan phantom over the frequency range 300-700 kHz and a Plexiglas phantom over the 3-7 MHz range. Both phantoms were flat and parallel plates featuring a step discontinuity milled into one of their initially flat sides. The through-transmitted signals were received by a 0.6 mm diameter membrane hydrophone that was raster scanned over a grid coaxial with the transmitting transducer. Signals received by the pseudoarray were processed offline to emulate phase sensitive and phase insensitive receivers with different aperture diameters. The data processed phase sensitively were focused to demonstrate the results of planar, geometrical, and correlation-based aberration correction methods. Results are presented illustrating the relative roles of interference in the ultrasonic field and phase cancellation at the receiving transducer in producing phase aberration artifacts. It was found that artifacts due to phase cancellation or interference can only be minimized with phase insensitive summation techniques by choosing an appropriately large receiving aperture. Data also suggest the potentially confounding role of time-and frequency-domain artifacts on ultrasonic measurements and illustrate the advantages of two-dimensional receiving arrays in determining the slope of attenuation (nBUA) for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

UltrasonicsBone and BonesBone DensityFractures, BoneHumansModels, TheoreticalOsteoporosisUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID19173437
PMCPMC2677275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.