ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2009
Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Analysis of Bulk and Surface Remodeling of Non-Woven PLLA and Fiber-Sponge PLLA/Chitosan Scaffolds in Cell Culture Environment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020Review
- Conventional, Bayesian, and Modified Prony's methods for characterizing fast and slow waves in equine cancellous bone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
- Bone mass of Spanish school children: impact of anthropometric, dietary and body composition factors.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2012Article
- Effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on broadband ultrasonic attenuation for trabecular bone in vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2011Article
- Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that phase cancellation at the receiving transducer can result in the overestimation of the frequency dependent ultrasonic attenuation of bone, a quantity that has been shown to correlate with bone mineral density and ultimately with osteoporotic fracture risk. Evidence supporting this interpretation is provided by phase insensitive processing of the data, which appear to reduce the apparent overestimates of attenuation. The present study was designed to clarify the components underlying phase aberration artifacts in such through-transmission measurements by conducting systematic studies of the simplest possible test objects capable of introducing phase aberration. Experimental results are presented for a Lexan phantom over the frequency range 300-700 kHz and a Plexiglas phantom over the 3-7 MHz range. Both phantoms were flat and parallel plates featuring a step discontinuity milled into one of their initially flat sides. The through-transmitted signals were received by a 0.6 mm diameter membrane hydrophone that was raster scanned over a grid coaxial with the transmitting transducer. Signals received by the pseudoarray were processed offline to emulate phase sensitive and phase insensitive receivers with different aperture diameters. The data processed phase sensitively were focused to demonstrate the results of planar, geometrical, and correlation-based aberration correction methods. Results are presented illustrating the relative roles of interference in the ultrasonic field and phase cancellation at the receiving transducer in producing phase aberration artifacts. It was found that artifacts due to phase cancellation or interference can only be minimized with phase insensitive summation techniques by choosing an appropriately large receiving aperture. Data also suggest the potentially confounding role of time-and frequency-domain artifacts on ultrasonic measurements and illustrate the advantages of two-dimensional receiving arrays in determining the slope of attenuation (nBUA) for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.