Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19172414›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2009

Invasive giant prolactinoma with loss of therapeutic response to cabergoline: expression of angiogenic markers.

María Susana Mallea-Gil, Carolina Cristina, María Inés Perez-Millan, Ana M Rodriguez Villafañe, Carolina Ballarino, Graciela Stalldecker, Damasia Becu-Villalobos

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The hallmarks of cancer… in pituitary tumors?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Management of medically refractory prolactinoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Susana Mallea-GilHospital Militar Central, Luis Maria Campos 726, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1426, Argentina.
Carolina Cristina
María Inés Perez-Millan
Ana M Rodriguez Villafañe
Carolina Ballarino
Graciela Stalldecker
Damasia Becu-Villalobos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study reports the case of a 70-year-old Caucasian man who was referred to the Military Hospital of Buenos Aires for evaluation of a giant sellar-extrasellar mass with extension in the right temporal lobe and compression of the third ventricle. Patient was initially responsive to cabergoline with reduction of prolactin levels and shrinkage of tumor burden for at least 36 months. Thereafter, prolactin levels and tumor size increased even though cabergoline dosage was increased. Transcraneal surgery was performed at 56 months of treatment. Prolactin levels and tumor proliferation did not subside and the patient died 14 months later. High GH and IGF-I levels were observed in the late stages of tumor development, with no evidence of acromegalic features. Immunohistochemistry of the excised tumor revealed strong immunoreactivity for VEGF and FGF-2, two potent angiogenic factors, and CD31 (an endothelial marker) indicating high vascularization of the adenoma.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCabergolineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErgolinesHumansHypothyroidismImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeovascularization, PathologicPituitary NeoplasmsProlactinProlactinomaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCabergolineErgolinesProlactin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.