ArticleWorld journal of surgery2009
Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Clinical Features and Outcomes of Appendectomy in Elderly vs. Non-Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- The SIFIPAC/WSES/SICG/SIMEU guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in the elderly (2019 edition).World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Guideline
- Epidemiology and Outcome of Acute Appendicitis during and before the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Article
- Differences in the Clinical Course of Acute Appendicitis in Geriatric Patient Groups.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2020Article
- Efficacy of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy in treating complicated appendicitis for elderly patients.Saudi medical journal · 2017Article
- Management, treatment and outcomes of acute appendicitis in an elderly population: a single-center experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017Article
- Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014Article
- Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014Article
- Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for appendicitis in elderly patients.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2011Article
- Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Article
- [Laparoscopic appendectomy. The new standard?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009Review
- Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.World journal of surgery · 2009Article
- Appendicitis is a Severe Disease in Elderly Patients: A Twenty-Year Audit.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer than open appendectomy in an elderly population.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients (60 years of age and older) is a challenging problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality when perforation is present. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) would enable an earlier correct diagnosis and have advantages in elderly patients.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected AA. Data of elderly patients were compared to data of younger patients (18 to <60 years of age).
resultsFifty-four LA were performed in elderly patients and 423 in younger patients. Patients over the age of 60 years had more co-morbidities and required more frequent use of anticoagulants. Preoperative imaging (ultrasound or computerized tomography) was significantly more frequent in elderly patients (36% versus 15%), and was associated with a higher rate of confirmation of acute appendicitis (78% versus 55%), which allowed a decrease in the rate of negative surgical explorations to 4.1% in elderly patients compared to 10.2% in younger patients. Complicated appendicitis and conversions were more frequent in the elderly patients. This resulted in prolonged operative time and longer hospital stay for this group. The overall complication rate was equivalent in the two groups, without differences in the occurrence either of infectious complications or of complications related to surgical site. There were no deaths following appendectomy in our series.
conclusionsLaparoscopic appendectomy is safe in the elderly population and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. The high incidence of complicated appendicitis in elderly patients affects operative time and length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy, and it can also lead to an increased rate of conversion to an open procedure. Use of preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scan is mandatory in elderly patients to provide an early diagnosis and to decrease unnecessary surgical exploration when acute appendicitis is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.