Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19172345›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2009

Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient.

Boris Kirshtein, Zvi Howard Perry, Solly Mizrahi, Leonid Lantsberg

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management, treatment and outcomes of acute appendicitis in an elderly population: a single-center experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Article
  8. Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014
    Article
  9. Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for appendicitis in elderly patients.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Laparoscopic appendectomy. The new standard?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Appendicitis is a Severe Disease in Elderly Patients: A Twenty-Year Audit.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  18. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer than open appendectomy in an elderly population.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  19. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris KirshteinDepartment of Surgery "A", Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel. orkirsh@bgu.ac.il
Zvi Howard Perry
Solly Mizrahi
Leonid Lantsberg
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILSoroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients (60 years of age and older) is a challenging problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality when perforation is present. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) would enable an earlier correct diagnosis and have advantages in elderly patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected AA. Data of elderly patients were compared to data of younger patients (18 to <60 years of age).

resultsFifty-four LA were performed in elderly patients and 423 in younger patients. Patients over the age of 60 years had more co-morbidities and required more frequent use of anticoagulants. Preoperative imaging (ultrasound or computerized tomography) was significantly more frequent in elderly patients (36% versus 15%), and was associated with a higher rate of confirmation of acute appendicitis (78% versus 55%), which allowed a decrease in the rate of negative surgical explorations to 4.1% in elderly patients compared to 10.2% in younger patients. Complicated appendicitis and conversions were more frequent in the elderly patients. This resulted in prolonged operative time and longer hospital stay for this group. The overall complication rate was equivalent in the two groups, without differences in the occurrence either of infectious complications or of complications related to surgical site. There were no deaths following appendectomy in our series.

conclusionsLaparoscopic appendectomy is safe in the elderly population and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. The high incidence of complicated appendicitis in elderly patients affects operative time and length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy, and it can also lead to an increased rate of conversion to an open procedure. Use of preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scan is mandatory in elderly patients to provide an early diagnosis and to decrease unnecessary surgical exploration when acute appendicitis is suspected.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnticoagulantsAppendectomyAppendicitisDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansIsraelLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID19172345
OpenAlexW2126248582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.