ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2009
Assessment of ePrescription quality: an observational study at three mail-order pharmacies.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risks to patient safety associated with implementation of electronic applications for medication management in ambulatory care--a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Pooled it
- Patients', pharmacists', and prescribers' attitude toward using blockchain and machine learning in a proposed ePrescription system: online survey.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- The Practice Guidelines for Multidose Drug Dispensing Need Revision-An Investigation of Prescription Problems and Interventions.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Factors Affecting Rural Patients' Primary Compliance with e-Prescription: A Developing Country Perspective.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019Article
- Observation for assessment of clinician performance: a narrative review.BMJ quality & safety · 2016Review
- Causes and consequences of e-prescribing errors in community pharmacies.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2015Review
- Improving Interoperability in ePrescribing.Interactive journal of medical research · 2012Article
- Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden.Pharmacy practice · 2012Article
- Pharmaceutical interventions on prescription problems in a Danish pharmacy setting.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2011Article
- Pharmacists' views on integrated electronic prescribing systems: associations between usefulness, pharmacological safety, and barriers to technology use.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
- Potential value of electronic prescribing in health economic and outcomes research.Patient related outcome measures · 2010Article
- Potential drug-drug interactions in prescriptions dispensed in community pharmacies in Greece.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2010Article
- E-prescribing: a focused review and new approach to addressing safety in pharmacies and primary care.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAPReview
- Retail pharmacy staff perceptions of design strengths and weaknesses of electronic prescribing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of electronic transfer of prescriptions (ETP) or ePrescriptions in ambulatory health care has been suggested to have a positive impact on the prescribing and dispensing processes. Thereby, implying that ePrescribing can improve safety, quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. In December 2007, 68% of all new prescriptions were transferred electronically in Sweden. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of ePrescriptions by comparing the proportions of ePrescriptions and non-electronic prescriptions necessitating a clarification contact (correction, completion or change) with the prescriber at the time of dispensing.
methodsA direct observational study was performed at three Swedish mail-order pharmacies which were known to dispense a large proportion of ePrescriptions (38-75%). Data were gathered on all ePrescriptions dispensed at these pharmacies over a three week period in February 2006. All clarification contacts with prescribers were included in the study and were classified and assessed in comparison with all drug prescriptions dispensed at the same pharmacies over the specified period.
resultsOf the 31225 prescriptions dispensed during the study period, clarification contacts were made for 2.0% (147/7532) of new ePrescriptions and 1.2% (79/6833) of new non-electronic prescriptions. This represented a relative risk (RR) of 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) for new ePrescriptions compared to new non-electronic prescriptions. The increased RR was mainly due to 'Dosage and directions for use', which had an RR of 7.6 (95% CI 2.8-20.4) when compared to other clarification contacts. In all, 89.5% of the suggested pharmacist interventions were accepted by the prescriber, 77.7% (192/247) as suggested and an additional 11.7% (29/247) after a modification during contact with the prescriber.
conclusionThe increased proportion of prescriptions necessitating a clarification contact for new ePrescriptions compared to new non-electronic prescriptions indicates the need for an increased focus on quality aspects in ePrescribing deployment. ETP technology should be developed towards a two-way communication between the prescriber and the pharmacist with automated checks of missing, inaccurate, or ambiguous information. This would enhance safety and quality for the patient and also improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness within the health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.