ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2009
God and genes in the caring professions: clinician and clergy perceptions of religion and genetics.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of a mainstream genetic testing pathway and socioeconomic factors on the uptake of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients: results of the nationwide GENE-SMART study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Genetic counselors' professional identity in North America: A scoping review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Neurospirituality Connectome - Role in Neurology and Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS).Neurology (E-Cronicon) · 2025Article
- Futuristic Thinking about Engineering "Geneospirituality" to Help Prevent Relapse of Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) Behaviors.EC psychology and psychiatry · 2023Article
- Decision-making for Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Southeast Asian BRCA Mutation Carriers With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Considering religion and spirituality in precision medicine.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Review
- Spiritual Exploration in the Prenatal Genetic Counseling Session.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- "I didn't know it existed before you called": protestant clergy experience, education and perceptions regarding genetics.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about how care providers' perceptions of religion and genetics affect interactions with patients/parishioners. This study investigates clinicians' and clergy's perceptions of and experiences with religion and genetics in their clinical and pastoral interactions. This is an exploratory qualitative study designed to elicit care providers' descriptions of experiences with religion and genetics in clinical or pastoral interactions. Thirteen focus groups were conducted with members of the caring professions: physicians, nurses, and genetics counselors (clinicians), ministers and chaplains (clergy). Preliminary analysis of qualitative data is presented here. Preliminary analysis highlights four positions in professional perceptions of the relationship between science and faith. Further, differences among professional perceptions appear to influence perceptions of needed or available resources for interactions with religion and genetics. Clinicians' and clergy's perceptions of how religion and genetics relate are not defined solely by professional affiliation. These non-role-defined perceptions may affect clinical and pastoral interactions, especially regarding resources for patients and parishioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.