Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19170079›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2009

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African-Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation.

Anita Y Kinney, James E Coxworth, Sara E Simonson, Joseph B Fanning

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita Y KinneyHuntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. anita.kinney@hci.utah.edu
James E Coxworth
Sara E Simonson
Joseph B Fanning
Huntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CORNELIA M ULRICH · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
BRCA1 TESTING IN A LARGE AFRICAN AMERICAN KINDREDR01HG002241 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KINNEY, ANITA Y · 2000 to 2003
$1.7M
Religion and Genomics: Navigating Pathways and Perspectives of Patient CareR13HG004689 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CLAYTON, ELLEN WRIGHT · 2008 to 2008
$32k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 042014NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NHGRI NIH HHS 1 R01 HG 02241-02S1NHGRI NIH HHS 1 R13 HG 004689-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002241NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG 02241NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG004689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a > or =25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (n = 99) were drawn from an African-American, Louisiana-based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self-directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (P < 0.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (X=22.9; SD=5.8) versus self-directing (X=12.8; SD = 5.1) and deferring (X=19.9; SD = 6.3). We did not observe significant associations between RS indicators and psychological distress, nor did we observe appreciable differences related to gender or risk perception. Although RS beliefs and practices are important for many African-Americans, we did not find evidence that indicators of self-reported RS are associated with psychological distress prior to genetic counseling and testing.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationReligionStress, PsychologicalBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19170079
PMCPMC3040977
OpenAlexW2140976876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.