Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19169957›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in molecular therapeutics2009

Cancer vaccines: current directions and perspectives in prostate cancer.

Mahsa Mohebtash, James L Gulley, Ravi A Madan, Theresa Ferrara, Philip M Arlen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in molecular therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Targeting inhibitory pathways in cancer immunotherapy.Current opinion in immunology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahsa MohebtashLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
James L Gulley
Ravi A Madan
Theresa Ferrara
Philip M Arlen
Center for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Cancer Therapy Clinical Trials Using Novel Recombinant VaccinesZIABC010666 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2009 to 2025
$22.4M
Vaccine Clinical TrialsZ01BC010666 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2005 to 2008
$1.7M
Combination therapies involving novel cancer vaccinesZIABC011281 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MADAN, RAVI · 2010 to 2013
$418k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous research groups are investigating the use of cancer vaccines as a potential therapeutic modality for various tumor types. The efficacy of cancer vaccines has improved because of advances in the characterization of tumor-associated antigens, the development of improved vaccine delivery systems, and the combination of vaccines with cytokines and other immunostimulants to enhance immune responses. Although cancer vaccines are under investigation for the treatment of various different tumor types, several characteristics of prostate cancer make it an ideal target for immunotherapy. The relative indolence of prostrate cancer allows sufficient time to generate immune responses, which usually take weeks or months to mount. In addition, prostate cancer-associated antigens direct the immune response to prostate cancer cells, thus sparing normal tissue. This review focuses on promising new strategies for combining vaccines with other therapeutic approaches, as well as novel perspectives in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19169957
PMCPMC3488286
OpenAlexW2106706256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.