Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19169121›Full record

ArticleMedical care2009

Changes over time and disparities in schizophrenia treatment quality.

Alisa B Busch, Anthony F Lehman, Howard Goldman, Richard G Frank

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identifying primary care quality indicators for people with serious mental illness: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measuring disparities across the distribution of mental health care expenditures.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alisa B BuschDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Program, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA. abusch@hcp.med.harvard.edu
Anthony F Lehman
Howard Goldman
Richard G Frank
Harvard University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Project 1: Improving Clinical Assessment of Diagnosis for Latinos (261-295)P50MH073469 · NIMH · CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE · PI ALEGRIA, MARGARITA · 2005 to 2009
$4.6M
Economic Impacts of New DrugsR01MH069721 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI NORMAND, SHARON-LISE TERESA · 2004 to 2006
$1.3M
Quality of Care for Bipolar DisorderK01MH071714 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BUSCH, ALISA B · 2006 to 2010
$886k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH071714NIMH NIH HHS K01MH071714NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH073469NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia medication and psychosocial treatment options have expanded since the Schizophrenia PORT was conducted. However, there also have been considerable changes in the delivery of mental health care in the public sector, as well as increasing state concerns about Medicaid cost containment.

objectivesTo examine trends and patient characteristics associated with differences in schizophrenia medication and visit treatment quality in a Medicaid population. RESEARCH

designObservational study of claims data from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 2001. SUBJECTS: Florida Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with schizophrenia (N = 23,619). MEASURES: We examined the likelihood of meeting any 1 and all 4 of the following quality standards: (1) receiving antipsychotic medication, (2) antipsychotic continuity, (3) dosing consistent with PORT recommendations, and (4) mental health visit continuity. Separate models were fit for acute and maintenance phases of treatment.

resultsApproximately 18% of acute and 7% of maintenance phases met all 4 quality standards. Antipsychotic quality improved (largely driven by an increasingly likelihood of receiving any antipsychotic), while visit continuity declined. The greatest disparities were seen for persons with co-occurring substance use disorders and of black race. Quality differences were often phase specific and at times in opposite directions across treatment phases.

conclusionsThe improvement in antipsychotic treatment quality is encouraging. However, visit continuity declined. This study highlights the importance of quality measurement that includes focus on different treatment modalities and phases of care, as well as for potentially vulnerable populations (such as persons with co-occurring substance use disorders and racial/ethnic minorities).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesComorbidityContinuity of Patient CareDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFloridaHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalizationHumansLong-Term CareMaleManaged Care ProgramsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19169121
PMCPMC2789766
OpenAlexW2042206413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.