Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19168633›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Multiple transcription factor codes activate epidermal wound-response genes in Drosophila.

Joseph C Pearson, Michelle T Juarez, Myungjin Kim, Øyvind Drivenes, William McGinnis

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Toll pathway is required for wound-induced expression of barrier repair genes in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in wound care · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Drivenes, Øyvind [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph C PearsonSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Michelle T Juarez
Myungjin Kim
Øyvind Drivenes
William McGinnis
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

UCSD/SDSU IRACDAK12GM068524 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TREJO, JOANN · 2003 to 2025
$24.4M
GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
Regulation of epidermal barrier wound repairR01GM077197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCGINNIS, WILLIAM JAMES · 2007 to 2010
$998k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM68524NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM068524NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077197NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM077197NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds in Drosophila and mouse embryos induce similar genetic pathways to repair epidermal barriers. However, the transcription factors that transduce wound signals to repair epidermal barriers are largely unknown. We characterize the transcriptional regulatory enhancers of 4 genes-Ddc, ple, msn, and kkv-that are rapidly activated in epidermal cells surrounding wounds in late Drosophila embryos and early larvae. These epidermal wound enhancers all contain evolutionarily conserved sequences matching binding sites for JUN/FOS and GRH transcription factors, but vary widely in trans- and cis-requirements for these inputs and their binding sites. We propose that the combination of GRH and FOS is part of an ancient wound-response pathway still used in vertebrates and invertebrates, but that other mechanisms have evolved that result in similar transcriptional output. A common, but largely untested assumption of bioinformatic analyses of gene regulatory networks is that transcription units activated in the same spatial and temporal patterns will require the same cis-regulatory codes. Our results indicate that this is an overly simplistic view.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationWound HealingAnimalsBinding SitesDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpidermisMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticMutationTime FactorsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19168633
PMCPMC2630199
OpenAlexW2122277738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.