Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19168490›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2009

Smoker-free workplace policies: developing a model of public health consequences of workplace policies barring employment to smokers.

B Houle, M Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Should Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions.International journal of health policy and management · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. “Hike up yer skirt, and quit.” what motivates and supports smoking cessation in builders and renovators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Health promotion site selection blues: barriers to participation and implementation.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B HouleDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, 223D Condon Hall, Box 353340, 1100 NE Campus Pkwy, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. bhoule@u.washington.edu
M Siegel

Funding

Population Research TrainingT32HD007543 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURRAN, SARA R. · 2002 to 2016
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A marked shift in tobacco-related workplace health promotion intervention involves the adoption of policies barring employment to smokers. We discuss the potential public health consequences of these policies on those affected-smokers, their families, the surrounding community and society at large. We find a lack of published evidence evaluating the effectiveness and consequences of these policies. By developing a model of policy effects, we outline possible unintended consequences. With such large gaps in the evidence base and the potential for deleterious consequences, we argue for increased discussion about the use of smoker-free employment policies as a public health intervention and for increased engagement of employers by the public health community in worksite health promotion.

Indexed as

EmploymentHealth PolicyHumansMental DisordersModels, OrganizationalOccupational HealthPersonnel SelectionPublic HealthSmokingSmoking PreventionStereotypingTobacco Smoke PollutionWorkplaceTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID19168490
PMCPMC2722043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.