Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19167872›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2009

Calling heads from tails: the role of mathematical modeling in understanding cell polarization.

Matthew D Onsum, Christopher V Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cell memory and adaptation in chemotaxis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tools for analyzing cell shape changes during chemotaxis.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. A modular positive feedback-based gene amplifier.Journal of biological engineering · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Symmetry breaking in the life cycle of the budding yeast.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew D OnsumMerrimack Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. monsum@merrimackpharma.com
Christopher V Rao

Funding

Multiscale analysis of neutrophil chemotaxis and signal integrationR01GM083601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RAO, CHRISTOPHER · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theorists have long speculated on the mechanisms driving directed and spontaneous cell polarization. Recently, experimentalists have uncovered many of the mechanisms underlying polarization, enabling these models to be directly tested. In the process, they have demonstrated the explanatory and predictive value of these models and, at the same time, uncovered additional complexities not currently explained by them. In this review, we discuss some of main theories regarding cell polarization and highlight how the intersection of mathematical and experimental biology has yielded new insights into these mechanisms in the case of budding yeast and eukaryotic chemotaxis.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityModels, BiologicalAnimalsEukaryotic CellsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID19167872
PMCPMC2692189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.