ReviewHuman genetics1991
Diagnosis of genetic disease using recombinant DNA. Third edition.
Review in Human genetics, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and challenges associated with clinical diagnostic genome sequencing: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2012Article
- Molecular characterization of the breakpoints of a 12-kb deletion in the NF1 gene in a family showing germ-line mosaicism.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- Diagnosis of human genetic disease using recombinant DNA. Fourth edition.Human genetics · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant DNA methodology has greatly increased our knowledge of the molecular pathology of the human genome at the same time as providing the means to diagnose inherited disease at the DNA level. Direct detection and analysis of a range of genetic defects are now possible using cloned gene or oligonucleotide probes or by direct sequencing of the disease gene(s). In addition, the use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) within and around these genes as indirect genetic markers has not potentiated the tracking of disease alleles in affected pedigrees in cases where direct analysis was not feasible. RFLPs associated with linked anonymous segments may also be used not only to diagnose hitherto undetectable disease states, but also for chromosomal localization of the loci responsible. We present here an updated list of reports describing both the direct and the indirect analysis/diagnosis of human inherited disease; it is intended to serve as a guide to current molecular genetic approaches in diagnostic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1916757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.