ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Effect of membrane composition on antimicrobial peptides aurein 2.2 and 2.3 from Australian southern bell frogs.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural pores not required: Antimicrobial peptides induce ion permeabilization of lipid membranes through transient water channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Novel peptaibiotics identified from Trichoderma clade Viride.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Flexibility in the Bioactivity of Short α-Helical Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- An Update on the Therapeutic Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides againstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Killing ofScience advances · 2023Article
- The dual interaction of antimicrobial peptides on bacteria and cancer cells; mechanism of action and therapeutic strategies of nanostructures.Microbial cell factories · 2022Review
- A review on antimicrobial peptides databases and the computational tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Review
- Multidrug resistance crisis during COVID-19 pandemic: Role of anti-microbial peptides as next-generation therapeutics.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Peptide Mechanisms Studied by Whole-Cell Deuterium NMR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Synthetic antimicrobial peptides as enhancers of the bacteriolytic action of staphylococcal phage endolysins.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Host Defense Peptides: Dual Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Lipidation of Antimicrobial Peptides as a Design Strategy for Future Alternatives to Antibiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Design, Engineering and Discovery of Novel α-Helical and β-Boomerang Antimicrobial Peptides against Drug Resistant Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Antimicrobial Peptide-Polymer Conjugates for Dentistry.ACS applied polymer materials · 2020Article
- Review
- Article
- A How-To Guide for Mode of Action Analysis of Antimicrobial Peptides.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides as Anti-Infective Agents in Pre-Post-Antibiotic Era?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of hydrophobic thickness and the molar phosphatidylglycerol (PG) content of lipid bilayers on the structure and membrane interaction of three cationic antimicrobial peptides were examined: aurein 2.2, aurein 2.3 (almost identical to aurein 2.2, except for a point mutation at residue 13), and a carboxy C-terminal analog of aurein 2.3. Circular dichroism results indicated that all three peptides adopt an alpha-helical structure in the presence of a 3:1 molar mixture of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)] (DMPC/DMPG), and 1:1 and 3:1 molar mixtures of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)] (POPC/POPG). Oriented circular dichroism data for three different lipid compositions showed that all three peptides were surface-adsorbed at low peptide concentrations, but were inserted into the membrane at higher peptide concentrations. The (31)P solid-state NMR data of the three peptides in the DMPC/DMPG and POPC/POPG bilayers showed that all three peptides significantly perturbed lipid headgroups, in a peptide or lipid composition-dependent manner. Differential scanning calorimetry results demonstrated that both amidated aurein peptides perturbed the overall phase structure of DMPC/DMPG bilayers, but perturbed the POPC/POPG chains less. The nature of the perturbation of DMPC/DMPG bilayers was most likely micellization, and for the POPC/POPG bilayers, distorted toroidal pores or localized membrane aggregate formation. Calcein release assay results showed that aurein peptide-induced membrane leakage was more severe in DMPC/DMPG liposomes than in POPC/POPG liposomes, and that aurein 2.2 induced higher calcein release than aurein 2.3 and aurein 2.3-COOH from 1:1 and 3:1 POPC/POPG liposomes. Finally, DiSC(3)5 assay data further delineated aurein 2.2 from the others by showing that it perturbed the lipid membranes of intact S. aureus C622 most efficiently, whereas aurein 2.3 had the same efficiency as gramicidin S, and aurein 2.3-COOH was the least efficient. Taken together, these data show that the membrane interactions of aurein peptides are affected by the hydrophobic thickness of the lipid bilayers and the PG content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.